So as you know if you’ve been playing my little game, my posts usually are discussions of actual data we have collected from what has actually happened and how that data puts the lie to pretty much everything we’ve been told by our government overlords, medical “experts”, and mainstream talking head imbeciles. I show you in plain language what the numbers are, what some particular lying idiot like Fauci or Biden or Walensky said, and how those numbers say something quite different from what everybody “knows” to be the case because Fauci or Biden or Rachel Maddow said so. But today will be a little different. Today we’ll look at some numbers that beg some pretty big questions instead of answering them. So cinch up your water wings and get ready to jump into what could end up being some very deep water.
From the BBC in an article published September 30, 2022 we get this headline (my bold): “Investigation into spikes in newborn baby deaths in Scotland” The article informs us that “At least 18 babies under four weeks old died in March. That came after at least 21 babies died in September last year.” Further “The average mortality rate among newborns is just over two per 1,000 births…In September 2021 at least 21 babies under four weeks old died, a rate of 4.9 per 1,000 births. And in March at least 18 died, the equivalent of 4.6 per 1,000 births…Meanwhile, in June it emerged there were 3.9 infant deaths for every thousand live births in 2021 - up from 3.1 the previous year. The figures showed the death rate for babies under one year old in Scotland is at its highest level in 10 years.”
So it appears that something is amiss in Scotland. What could it be? What’s been different over the past few years that could lead to this sort of thing; a more than DOUBLING of the newborn death rate in some months and an overall increase in infant deaths of more than 25%? Well the obvious answer is COVID. See, that’s why you should be getting VAC-CIN-ATED (my best Joe Biden impersonation) you selfish bastard, because this.
But wait, it turns out “A preliminary investigation found the September spike was not linked to Covid.” In another article from the SCOTSMAN newspaper also published on September 30th we get this headline: “Scottish Government orders review as neonatal deaths higher than expected” in which we’re told “Dr Sarah Stock, an expert in maternal and foetal medicine at the University of Edinburgh, told a national newspaper earlier this year: ‘I think the numbers are really troubling and I don't think we know the reasons why yet…What we do know it's not neonatal Covid – the rates of Covid-19 infection in babies are very low and deaths from Covid are thankfully very, very small, so this isn't Covid affecting babies.’” (And for the love of all that’s holy, it’s COVID, not Covid. Do editors not exist anymore?)
So if it’s not baby COVID, then what is it? Is it possible that the mother’s (or birthing-persons, you know whatever works for you) contracted COVID during the pregnancy and that did something bad without actually infecting the baby? I guess that’s certainly a possibility, but we all know what we’re thinking here – the vax! Well, if you’re thinking that then you’re just a basement-dwelling conspiracy kook. You see, the vax has also been ruled out.
We’re told in The Herald newspaper on October 9th “Covid Scotland: Vaccines ruled out in neonatal deaths spike” The intrepid author who is a “Health Correspondent” tells us “A year on, the cause of last September's abnormal spike in neonatal mortality remains a mystery. Experts have ruled out Covid vaccines and there seems to be no direct link with Covid infections. Staff shortages are considered one 'plausible' explanation.” So there anti-vax crackpot, it ain’t vaccines either. Stick that in your tinfoil hat and smoke it. Whew, that was close. Hey, you know how all these "excess deaths" we're experiencing"remain a mystery"? Lot's of mysteries. And it’s good to know that the very next sentence in this piece tells us “PUBLIC health experts ruled out any link between spikes in neonatal deaths and the Covid vaccine without checking whether any of the infants' mothers had received the jag (sic) during pregnancy.”
I have to include a lot of quoting because some might otherwise think I’m making this crap up. It’s really quite unbelievable.
“Experts stressed that there was no “plausible” link between the unusually high levels of mortality among newborns in September last year and March this year to justify investigating maternal vaccination status. Public Health Scotland (PHS) said its consultants had given “careful consideration” to the “potential benefits and harms” of carrying out such as (sic) analysis as part of its probe into the tragic deaths of 39 infants, but concluded against doing so because “it was not possible to identify a scenario that would have resulted in a change to public health policy or practice” given that vaccination policy was already “appropriately informed by good-quality population-level evidence and safety data”. So I think what this is saying is they didn’t bother investigating a possible link to vaccines because their vaccine policy was already in place and they weren’t gonna change it anyway so why bother. That sounds reasonable, no?
But wait, it gets better: “In a statement, PHS added that there was also a risk that ‘identifying the vaccination status of the mothers, even at aggregate level, would result in harm to those individuals and others close to them, through actual or perceived judgement of the effects of their personal vaccination decision.’ Furthermore ‘the outcomes of such analysis, whilst being uninformative for public health decision making, had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence at this critical time.’” Did you ever notice how it’s ALWAYS a “critical time”?
But wait, there’s more: “The decision came to light after the Herald on Sunday obtained internal emails and reports under freedom of information tracking the PHS response, with one email dated November 24 2021 stating: ‘We do not have any plans to examine maternal vaccination status, as there is no public health reason to do so.’”
So first, if they ascertained the vax status of the mothers of dead babies, that information, the NAMES of these women, would somehow get out into the public and then these women might face some backlash and that’s why we’re not investigating the possibility that vaccinating pregnant women or women who soon become pregnant after vaccination might be causing their babies to die? And since we have NO PLANS to investigate the possibility that the vaccine is killing babies, there’s no reason to do so. Wow, that’s impressive. Gotta say though, that’s just lazy writing. Somebody’s got to do better. At least make it a challenge to unmask your complete lack of competence, honesty, or decency.
Am I saying that vaccines are in fact killing babies? No. I have no evidence of that. Could it be COVID? Certainly a possibility. Could it be the vaccine? Certainly a possibility. The problem here is the refusal to even look at the issue; the insistence that it could not POSSIBLY be the vax. How hard would it be to collect all the data on newborn deaths over the last two years (which they already have in Scotland as they keep excellent records) and then ascertain the vaccine status of the mothers and when they were vaccinated. If a high percentage of babies who die soon after birth are born to vaccinated mothers, that might be something worth knowing.
SOMETHING is going on here, don’t we have a right to know what it is? Why the refusal to even look at the issue? Yeah, yeah, I know…look, PUTIN.