top of page
Search

THE BOOSTER IS BETTER

11/7/22


So in case you’re not aware, there’s this “bivalent” booster shot available now to protect you from becoming infected with and subsequently dying from a virus which poses you essentially a ZERO percent chance of said dying. This booster underwent, as all vaccines do, rigorous testing and long-term safety surveillance before the FDA approve it for use on the American people. That is all true; except for the parts about the rigorous testing and long-term safety surveillance. But the rest is absolutely true. Anyway, the early press on this new booster wasn’t so positive with at least two initial studies showing it didn’t raise antibodies to the Omicron variant (the current king of the hill) any better than the previous original strain booster. This I’m sure was very disappointing to our government overlords, medical “experts” and corporate criminals who have assured us we need to boost up to protect the very existence of planet earth.


But fear not, NEW data released by Pfizer itself, which makes the vaccine and accrues obscene profits from same, reports in an article published by STAT News and many other sources (my bold) “Pfizer, BioNTech report new Covid booster is more protective against recent Omicron variants than original vaccine” STAT is owned and operated by the Boston Globe, an alleged “news” organization so you can feel confident that the report is true and accurate. By the way, it’s “COVID” you illiterate morons! It’s not a word, it’s an acronym; like SCUBA or RADAR or Navy SEALs. You’d think there would be at least one reporter or editor at the Boston Globe who could stop taking selfies long enough to know this by now. But I digress…


Anyway, here’s the picture used in this piece written by yet another example of a child playing dress-up and pretending to be a “reporter”:







Seems this news “report” is more of an advertisement (some might say propaganda)

than a “news” piece in which the “reporter” investigates the veracity of the claims made by the company earning tens of billions of dollars in profits from this product. But whatever…


We’re told “The companies said the levels of neutralizing antibodies that target the BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus were four-fold higher in people aged 55 and older who received the bivalent booster than in similarly aged people who received a monovalent booster.” So you produce more antibodies to BA.4 and BA.5 when you get a booster containing those two strains than you do when you get a jab that doesn't contain those two strains. Sweet, case closed. Roll up your sleeve and get in line.


Except observed antibody levels don’t tell us anything about how “protective” this booster will be against infection, severe disease, or death. Of course you’re going to see (a very temporary) increase in antibodies when you inject a human being with a substance that forces their human body to produce a viral protein heretofore never produced by a human body in the history of human bodies. We’ve been watching this show for almost two years now. But to quote Gene Hackman in the movie Crimson Tide “Some of the things they do, uh, defy belief. Their training program is simplicity itself. You just stick a cattle prod up their ass and you can get a horse to deal cards.” Who cares about forced increases of antibody levels, does that forced increase in antibodies do anything to keep me “safer”? Oh, sorry. THAT kind of data we don’t have. We’ll just consult the eight mice we tested this booster on and get back to you.


Second and more importantly, what about how the antibody reaction looked in people under 55? Where’s that data? You see, as a PBS NEWS HOUR piece entitled “Experts say children should get a COVID-19 bivalent booster. Here’s what you need to know” published just two weeks ago tells us “Newly formulated COVID-19 booster shots can help protect children and lower transmission of the coronavirus as the U.S. prepares for a possible spike in cases heading into the fall and winter.” Really? Do tell. I guess the people over at PBS don’t actually read or watch any “news” because about two weeks before this report was published there was something of a stink about a Pfizer exec admitting they never tested as to transmission reduction. Now the liars, I mean “fact-checkers” will tell you “Pfizer was always clear it did not test whether the vaccines reduced the risk of transmission among already-infected individuals. But the trial did show the vaccines reduced infection risk in the first place, so reduced the risk of onward infection.” Aren’t these people so clever? Hey remember when we were told the vax "reduced infection risk" by 95%? Good times. But the fact is, Pfizer was never “clear” let alone “always clear” about not testing for transmission. Pfizer never said anything about it, they were never asked. And then Anthony Fauci and his friends started telling us it would “stop transmission” (Is there actually ANYBODY out there who doesn’t remember the lies about this?) and Pfizer just never corrected them. See how that works? “We never said it would stop transmission. Other people said it, but not us.”


But here you have PBS telling us the shot “can” help protect children, which is like me saying I “can” score a hole-in-one on the golf course. I am CAPABLE of doing it; it COULD happen, but then again as the old saying goes, if my grandmother had testicles she’d be my grandfather (although apparently today grandma wouldn’t even need the extra equipment; “science” tells us she just is grandpa if she thinks she is). And the “lower transmission” is just a flat out lie, semantics be damned. The fact-checkers really aren’t that clever.


So we have the government-funded state media (they are certainly not alone) pushing the booster on five year olds, and we have Pfizer announcing how good their booster is at increasing antibodies in people over 54 (by the way, it really wasn’t that good) but no actual data released on children whom “experts” are urging to get jabbed. Fortunately, less than one-third of kids 5-11 have even been “fully vaccinated” with the initial two shots so I guess there still is some sanity left in America.


Today’s take home message is an oldie but goodie; we are being lied to by everybody about everything everyday. There is NO data to support any true efficacy of this new booster in people of any age; especially children. But there is plenty of data of damage from these vaccines. Dumbfounding as it is, there are still people listening to these liars and idiots. If you know one of them try to drag them out of the cult. Someday they’ll thank you.

27 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

1/31/23 So in case you didn't know, in September of 2019, just as the evil coronavirus began to circulate (it magically came from a bat at that very same time, you know) Bill Gates invested 55 million

1/30/23 So I titled this "PART 1" because I'll revisit this sort of thing from time to time. I could write a piece about this stuff every single day, but where's the fun in that? The "thing" is the ba

1/27/23 Here’s an interesting tidbit from the UK report on COVID vaccines we discussed yesterday (post found here: https://www.springfieldholisticwellness.com/post/uk-bans-boosters) concerning the BS

bottom of page