top of page



So if you watch mainstream media you may not be aware of a new recommendation out of Florida in which the state Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Lapado says, based on a study done there, men from the ages of 18 to 39 SHOULD NOT get an mRNA vaccine. I searched “Florida recommends against COVID vaccine for 18-39 year old males” on both CNN and MSNBC but nothing came up; oh well (maybe it’s the anti-crazy filter I have on my computer). Of course if you search “Florida death cult” on MSNBC, referring to Mika Brzezinski’s rant about the stupid folks in Florida who declined the vaccine thank you very much, THAT story comes up.

Anyway (my bold), “This analysis found that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence [RI] of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination.” Specifically as to cardiac death, “Concerning vaccination type, males receiving mRNA vaccination had significantly higher risk…while males receiving vaccinations that were not mRNA/unknown had significantly lower risk.” so while this evaluation has, as do all studies, its flaws, the fact that the data clearly discern as to the risk of cardiac death between mRNA and non-mRNA vaccines certainly seems to substantiate these findings. And the study found “In the 28 days following vaccination, a statistically significant increase in cardiac-related deaths was detected for the entire study population…Stratifying by age group revealed RIs were significantly higher for age groups 25 - 39 (RI = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.35 - 3.47) and 60 or older (RI = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01 - 1.10).” That means the risk of cardiac death was roughly two to as much as three and a half times higher for people aged 25-39 in the 28 days following vaccination with an mRNA vaccine. The analysis also shows a 7% increase in cardiac deaths for everybody.

Here’s the bottom line: According to the CDC’s own data, the chances that a male between 18 and 39 years of age will fall prey to the evil ‘rona stands at about 0.03%. That’s three one-hundredths of one percent; that’s essentially zero. As we have discussed many times before, you CANNOT improve on a ZERO risk so the vaccine CANNOT provided any benefit to males in this age group. And that’s based on the CDC’s classification of “All Deaths involving COVID-19” which is defined as “Deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19…”, so 0.03% is the end-of-the-rainbow, worst-case scenario number.

So why would you tolerate ANY risk to yourself, your husband, or your child for a ZERO benefit? By the way, whatever happened to the “safe” part of “safe and effective”? By the way again, if I lived in California, where they’re forcing all school children to take the vax that could cause heart damage but can provide no protection against a virus which is no threat to them to begin with, I could have my license taken from me for discussing this information because they would deem it “misinformation”. Although they might have to get in line, because the feds might ambush me at an Arby’s drive-thru and send me to the gulag for disseminating “malinformation” which the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (they sound like fun) defines as “based on fact, but used out of context to mislead, harm, or manipulate.” So if the FACT that the mRNA jab appears to cause heart damage and death in young males chafes your britches, give the feds a call; I’m standin’ here. I will say for complete consistency, these increases are compared to very small bases to begin with but it’s still a risk bigger than the potential benefit of the vax.

By the way one more time, when the Surgeon General of Florida, the third largest state in the nation, Dr. Joseph Lapado first tweeted this information, Twitter took down his tweet for “violating community guidelines”. But you keep believing the “experts”. They definitely are telling the truth…DEFINITELY.

31 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page