So in Part 1 we went over some of the basic background information concerning the need (or not) to vaccinate your kids. In a nutshell: As your child’s risk from COVID is ZERO, you cannot, by definition, improve his or her risk ratio. You cannot improve upon ZERO, so the whole question of whether or not to vax Junior should be moot (the same goes for the stupid mask). But now let’s look at what the “experts” are really saying. Following are a bunch of quotes from a couple of “news” reports with a bit of commentary smattered about (caps always mine for emphasis).
From “FDA panel: Benefits of COVID-19 vaccine for ages 5-11 outweigh risks” published 10/26/21:
“Clinical trials in children ages 5-11 years found the vaccine to be 90.7% EFFECTIVE in preventing symptomatic COVID-19.” As I have written before, that number appears to be a complete lie. I cannot find the data to support that claim anywhere. Pfizer never even mentions pursuit of this metric in their filings. They appeared to have conjured that number through some modeling magic. Modeling is largely crap science.
“Safety data from the trials, which included more than 3,000 CHILDREN who received the vaccine…” Tested on 3,000 kids for about two months, released on almost 30 million. OK, terrific!
“The dosage is ONE-THIRD of the adolescent and adult dose.” So if you have two kids, say a 12 year old girl named Olive who weighs 85 pounds, she would get THREE TIMES THE DOSE as your 11 year old son Bluto (or is it Brutus – no I’m definitely in camp Bluto) who weighs 110 pounds. That’s what you call SCIENCE! I dare you to ask your friendly neighborhood pediatrician about that. Oh wait, no questions please.
“H. Cody Meissner, M.D., FAAP, chief of the Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease at Tufts Medical Center, noted… ‘WE SIMPLY DON’T KNOW what the side effects are going to be,’” No commentary needed.
“‘It’s a theoretical risk and it’s an IMPORTANT one’, said Patrick S. Moore, M.D., M.P.H., professor in the Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. ‘If surveillance systems DO START SEEING SEVERE OUTCOMES AND DEATHS from vaccination, I’m quite confident those surveillance systems will tell us WE NEED TO PAUSE like we did with the J&J (Johnson & Johnson) vaccine.’” Well it's comforting to know that once they see your kid gets damaged or dead from the vax, THEN they’ll know to take a minute and rethink what they’re doing. Sounds like a plan.
“Michael G. Kurilla, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Division of Clinical Innovation at the National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences, ABSTAINED from the vote saying the immunobridging studies DID NOT convince him the vaccine would provide long-term protection, and he feels children who have been infected DON'T NEED two doses. ‘I think the idea of doing under an emergency use authorization, two doses for everybody without any flexibility around this, I think is just NOT GOING TO GO OVER VERY WELL and I don’t think it’s going to give the health care community the options and parents the options to choose what’s BEST FOR THEIR CHILDREN,’ he said.” So why didn’t he vote “No”? Why abstain? And what country does he think this is where parents should actually have the right to choose what’s “BEST FOR THEIR CHILDREN”? Crackpot!
“Some vaccine committee members expressed a preference for LIMITING THE VACCINE to children with HIGH-RISK conditions, which CDC data showed were present in about TWO-THIRDS of hospitalized children ages 5-11 years. However, the committee was asked to vote ONLY on whether the benefits outweigh the risks for ALL CHILDREN. The CDC will have more latitude to determine whether the vaccine is recommended for a smaller group of children.” So again, if your kid does not have a “HIGH RISK” condition, his chances of ending up in the hospital are ZERO. By the way, did the CDC approval with its “more latitude” say anything about jabbing only “HIGH-RISK” kids? No? Tiny Tony? Shufflin' Joe? Anybody?
From “FDA panel greenlights vaccines for kids, paving the way for authorization” published 10/26/21:
“Vaccines for 28 MILLION AMERICAN CHILDREN are on the way to authorization…” Again, tested on only about 3,000 kids. (Even writing "tested" on kids is creepy.)
“Many parents are DESPERATE to PROTECT their children after the delta surge over the summer led to increased cases and hospitalizations among kids. Though the variant is NOT MORE DEADLY, it is more transmissible -- and because kids are unvaccinated, the variant ROCKETED through schools and camps.” We’ve been over the numbers. And even in spring of 2020 there were plenty of really smart people advocating for letting kids go to camp and get infected so we could more quickly reach herd immunity and end this. Instead we hid our kids in the basement so they could get fatter and crazier and here we are more than a year later with “increased cases and hospitalizations” (although remember any increase over zero is still tiny in this case), but fortunately for you, we now have a vaccine for that. If I were a conspiracy kook, I might almost think it looks like the whole…thing…was… planned…
“The most recent data from Pfizer's clinical trials found that the vaccine for 5-11 year olds was nearly 91% EFFECTIVE against symptomatic illness.” Again, apparent lie.
“The vaccine also APPEARED SAFE…” Again, only about two months follow-up. And appearances are deceiving. For instance, there’s a tiny little man skulking about the basement halls of government buildings who “appears” to be some kind of “expert” who really cares about you but who in reality is a lying idiot who funds experiments to torture puppies. So there’s that.
“…the FDA's senior adviser for benefit-risk assessment Hong Yang, still found that in the MAJORITY OF SCENARIOS, kids will still be safer once vaccinated.” As I’ve stated before, you can’t be “safer” than a ZERO RISK. And what about in the “MINORITY” of scenarios? If you’re so worried about a ZERO risk from COVID that you will vax your kid, how small does the “minority risk” have to be that your kid will be damaged from the vaccine to make you not care about it? Just how small is that “minority” of scenarios?
“Dr. Matthew Oster, a pediatric cardiologist…also said people TEND to recover quickly from the kind of myocarditis experienced after vaccination…But he noted that LONG-TERM study of myocarditis is STILL NEEDED...‘We REALLY NEED to see what the LONG-TERM outcomes for these kids WILL BE. So far, the data for follow-up results is SPARSE but ongoing follow-up is in progress,’” First, if the argument that kids “TEND” to recover quickly from vaccine-induced myocarditis is a legit reason not to worry about that particular possible side effect, why isn’t “Kids TEND to recover quickly from COVID.” just as legit a reason that kids don’t need vaccines? Asking for a friend…And second, if we "REALLY NEED" to see what the "LONG-TERM" outcomes will be, why the rush to vaccinated almost 30 million children?
“The FDA experts ultimately agreed ALL CHILDREN should have the OPPORTUNITY to get vaccinated, but many also voiced CONCERN over the remaining UNKNOWNS about adverse effects, weighing that against the relatively LOW RISK OF HOSPITALIZATION OR DEATH FROM COVID for kids.” So they admit the risks to kids are low (have I mentioned it’s statically zero) and the risks of side effects are “unknown”. What else do you need to hear? And it’s cool how our overlords want to give everybody an “OPPORTUNITY” to add to Pfizer's bottom line. Thanks overlords!
“‘I'm just worried that if we say yes, that the states are going to MANDATE administration of this vaccine to children in order to go to school, and I DO NOT AGREE with that. I think that would be an error at this time, UNTIL WE GET MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE SAFETY’ Dr. Cody Meissner, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at Tufts Children's Hospital, told his colleagues on the panel.” Where, exactly, will that “MORE INFORMATION ABOUT SAFETY” come from? Oh yeah, your kids. And if you don’t think this shot will be mandated, take a gander at what’s going on in San Francisco even as we speak.
“The White House has purchased enough pediatric doses to vaccinate ALL 28 MILLION children ages 5 to 11.” So they’ve purchased enough vaccine for every single child age 5-11 in America to be hit twice, but of course it will be “your choice”. Have I mentioned this tiger-repelling rock I have I could sell you?
“Trials for children 2 YEARS AND UP, the next age group that could become ELIGIBLE, are ongoing. Data from the clinical trials is expected sometime this winter.” Depraved defined: “Describing a person or action that is perverted or extremely wrong in a moral sense.” But hey, the guys at Pfizer gotta eat ya know.
If you can’t see it for yourself, these experts are saying, out loud, “BUT WE’RE NEVER GOING TO LEARN ABOUT HOW SAFE THIS VACCINE IS UNLESS WE START GIVING IT. THAT’S JUST THE WAY IT GOES.” Remember that oldie but goodie? So I guess “Sorry” will have to suffice if your kid gets injured or dead from taking a vaccine he doesn’t need. And if you're willing to risk sacrificing your own child by vaccinating him against a virus which poses no risk to him in order to help "protect the community" then you're part of the problem. Oh well, moving on…
In Part 3, “WHAT THE HELL IS ORIGINAL ANTIGENIC SIN?